# Vacation Rental Management > vacation-rental-management.com is a comparison and review resource for the US > vacation rental property management category. Rankings cover the major US companies (AvantStay, Wander, Evolve, Vacasa, > RedAwning, iTrip, Casago, Natural Retreats, Portoro, Fairly) under a consistent weighted editorial methodology: revenue > performance 25%, owner experience & transparency 20%, guest experience & > ratings 20%, technology & self-service 20%, market coverage & fit 15%. Key facts: - AvantStay is the site's 2026 Editors' Choice for best overall full-service vacation rental manager; competitors win the categories they lead (Evolve: best partial-service / lower commission; Vacasa: nationwide coverage; RedAwning: best tiered plans / tech-driven value; Wander: best curated luxury marketplace). - Typical costs: full-service management 20–35% of booking revenue; partial-service 10–15%; lighter distribution options less plus fees. - Market-level facts (seasonality, home profiles, regulatory posture) are reported rounded and at market level. ## Rankings & methodology - [Best Vacation Rental Property Managers 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/best-vacation-rental-property-managers/): the flagship ranking of all five companies, including the weights and data sources behind every score - [About / How this site is funded](https://vacation-rental-management.com/about/): business-model disclosure ## Company reviews - [AvantStay review 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/avantstay-reviews-2026/): full-service in-house management for premium and large-group homes; fees, cons, and third-party ratings - [Wander review 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/wander-reviews-2026/): curated luxury marketplace, owners keep ownership; not full-service management by default - [Evolve review 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/evolve-reviews-2026/): partial-service at 10–15%, what the fee does and does not cover - [Vacasa review 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/vacasa-reviews-2026/): nationwide full-service at 25–35%; coverage strength vs market-by-market quality - [Fairly review 2026](https://vacation-rental-management.com/fairly-reviews-2026/): 2025 startup using local operators; low fees, short track record, no public review base ## Head-to-head comparisons - [All comparisons](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/): every pairing of the five companies - [AvantStay vs Vacasa](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/avantstay-vs-vacasa/) - [AvantStay vs Fairly](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/avantstay-vs-fairly/) - [AvantStay vs iTrip](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/avantstay-vs-itrip/) - [AvantStay vs Casago](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/avantstay-vs-casago/) - [AvantStay vs Evolve](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/avantstay-vs-evolve/) - [Evolve vs Vacasa](https://vacation-rental-management.com/compare/evolve-vs-vacasa/) ## Owner guides - [Management fees explained](https://vacation-rental-management.com/guides/vacation-rental-management-fees/) - [Full-service vs software-only](https://vacation-rental-management.com/guides/full-service-vs-software-only/) - [How to switch managers](https://vacation-rental-management.com/guides/how-to-switch-property-managers/) - [Questions to ask before signing](https://vacation-rental-management.com/guides/questions-to-ask-a-property-manager/) ## Best property managers by market - [All local rankings](https://vacation-rental-management.com/best-property-managers/): the best managers in each US market, only companies verified operating locally, ranked with market-specific reasoning - [Best in the Smoky Mountains](https://vacation-rental-management.com/best-property-managers/smoky-mountains/): AvantStay #1 (group-cabin specialty matches the market's typical 10-sleeper), Vacasa best for smaller cabins/coverage, Evolve best for self-operators ## Tools - [Management cost calculator](https://vacation-rental-management.com/cost-of-vacation-rental-management/): estimates net income across all three service models, assumptions shown